Dispensationalism and Salvation: Does Dispensationalism Teach Arminianism, Antinomianism, Cheap Grace, and Multiple Ways of Salvation?

eDocument in PDF Format (Electronic download zipped file)
Product #ed029 31 pages; 42 sources; Bibliography included
Price: $8.95 Click here to purchase

We accept all major credit cards using a Secure Order Process at ClickBank.com.

Money back guarantee - We provide quality, professional eBooks and eDocuments. If you are not completely satisfied with the contents or our services please notify us within 24 hours of your purchase and we will gladly refund your money.

(Sample only - Actual eDocument is in PDF Format)

Introduction

Throughout the twentieth century dispensationalism was embroiled in various controversies related to the doctrine of salvation. At times, the rhetoric became quite serious. John Gerstner, for instance, labeled dispensationalism as "dubious evangelicalism" and accused dispensationalism of teaching "another gospel." Some nondispensationalists have claimed that dispensationalism inherently leads to certain soteriological positions such as belief in multiple ways of salvation, Arminianism, antinomianism, and a non-lordship view of salvation. Dispensationalists have responded to their critics and have attempted to clarify what they believe to be the correct relationship between dispensationalism and soteriology.
Although debates concerning dispensationalism and soteriology continue, enough has been written on this subject by dispensationalists and nondispensationalists to adequately draw some conclusions concerning the relationship between dispensationalism and soteriology. That is what this work will attempt to do. In short, this work will do two main things. First, it will examine whether there is an inherent relationship between dispensationalism and soteriology. Second, this work will look at whether dispensationalism necessarily leads to certain soteriological views such as belief in multiple ways of salvation, Arminianism, antinomianism, and a non-lordship position of salvation.
This article is not concerned with promoting or refuting any particular soteriological view or views associated with dispensationalism. Nor is its purpose to show that dispensationalists are more or less correct than nondispensationalists when it comes to their understanding of soteriological issues. Rather, its sole intent is to precisely examine what relationship, if any, exists between dispensationalism and soteriology and to analyze whether dispensationalism necessarily leads to certain soteriological views.

End of Sample